Re: Column oriented pgsql
От | bfriedman.postgresql |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Column oriented pgsql |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4A04E0C4.7040201@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Column oriented pgsql (Mag Gam <magawake@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
If you are looking for a column based dbms, you might want to check out Monet - it is a columnar database.
http://monetdb.cwi.nl/
For some applications, columnar databases can be much faster than traditional rdbms systems. However, column based databases are not a 'one size fits all' answer.
Brent Friedman
Mag Gam wrote:
http://monetdb.cwi.nl/
For some applications, columnar databases can be much faster than traditional rdbms systems. However, column based databases are not a 'one size fits all' answer.
Brent Friedman
Mag Gam wrote:
Got it thanks! On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Christophe <xof@thebuild.com> wrote:On May 8, 2009, at 11:25 AM, John R Pierce wrote:you read your tables by column, rather than by row?? SQL queries are inherently row oriented, the fundamental unit of storage is a 'tuple', which is a representation of a row of a table.I believe what is referring to is the disk storage organization, clustering a single column from multiple rows together onto a page. For example, if your typical use of a table is to read one particular column from a large number of rows, this could (in theory) improve performance. AFAIK, PostgreSQL doesn't support this. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: