Re: bytea vs. pg_dump
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: bytea vs. pg_dump |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4A0066F9.60105@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: bytea vs. pg_dump (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: bytea vs. pg_dump
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes: > >> Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de> wrote: >> >>> Another approach would be to just dump bytea columns in binary >>> format only (not sure how doable that is, though). >>> > > >> If that's not doable, perhaps a base64 option for bytea COPY? >> > > I'm thinking plain old pairs-of-hex-digits might be the best > tradeoff if conversion speed is the criterion. The main problem > in any case would be to decide how to control the format option. > > > Yeah. Any ideas on how to do that? I can't think of anything very clean offhand. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: