Re: How to improve db performance with $7K?
От | Dave Held |
---|---|
Тема | Re: How to improve db performance with $7K? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 49E94D0CFCD4DB43AFBA928DDD20C8F9026184B5@asg002.asg.local обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | How to improve db performance with $7K? (Steve Poe <spoe@sfnet.cc>) |
Ответы |
Re: How to improve db performance with $7K?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Greg Stark [mailto:gsstark@mit.edu] > Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 9:59 AM > To: William Yu > Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [PERFORM] How to improve db performance with $7K? > > William Yu <wyu@talisys.com> writes: > > > Using the above prices for a fixed budget for RAID-10, you > > could get: > > > > SATA 7200 -- 680MB per $1000 > > SATA 10K -- 200MB per $1000 > > SCSI 10K -- 125MB per $1000 > > What a lot of these analyses miss is that cheaper == faster > because cheaper means you can buy more spindles for the same > price. I'm assuming you picked equal sized drives to compare > so that 200MB/$1000 for SATA is almost twice as many spindles > as the 125MB/$1000. That means it would have almost double > the bandwidth. And the 7200 RPM case would have more than 5x > the bandwidth. > [...] Hmm...so you're saying that at some point, quantity beats quality? That's an interesting point. However, it presumes that you can actually distribute your data over a larger number of drives. If you have a db with a bottleneck of one or two very large tables, the extra spindles won't help unless you break up the tables and glue them together with query magic. But it's still a point to consider. __ David B. Held Software Engineer/Array Services Group 200 14th Ave. East, Sartell, MN 56377 320.534.3637 320.253.7800 800.752.8129
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: