Re: In memory Database for postgres
От | NTPT |
---|---|
Тема | Re: In memory Database for postgres |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 49E3C387.9070307@centrum.cz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: In memory Database for postgres (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
If you need to run some database really fast, try to put only all your indexes onto ram disk. Look here... http://www.linux.com/feature/142658 They use SSD to store indexes (not data) for postgresql. A think the same conclusions should apply for ram disk too. And in wrost case (power off for RAM disk or wear out for SSD) you need only a reindex to build your indexes again Scott Marlowe napsal(a): > On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 2:06 PM, aravind chandu <avin_friends@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Thanks for your reply,but what I am actually looking for is >> database should be an in-memory database and at the same i want to store >> that data into disk so that data won't be lost when the system restarts or >> in case of power failure. Can you guys tell me the procedure how to do this? >> your help will he greatly appreciated. >> > > But that's just the point people have been making. A small enough db > will be cached completely in memory, and the only time you'll have to > access the disks is the first read, and during writes, which can be > made to happen mostly after the fact and not influence the rest of the > db. > > You're trying to reinvent a wheel to solve a non-existent problem. > >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: