Re: Closing some 8.4 open items

Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>   
>> Here is my thinking, and considering that that would basically involve a 
>> forward-looking design decision right now, I would support dropping the 
>> cardinality() function from 8.4 (if people agree that this is in fact the 
>> design decision to make).
>>     
>
> At this point I'd support that too.  It doesn't seem that getting
> cardinality() into 8.4 is important enough to risk making a decision
> that we'd regret later.  And I think it's not hard to make the case
> that we might regret either of the other choices later, depending on
> where we go with arrays.
>
>     
>   

+1

cheers

andrew