Re: Hard-coded PUBLIC in pg_dump
От | David Wheeler |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hard-coded PUBLIC in pg_dump |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 49D4448A-055E-11D7-8D38-0003931A964A@wheeler.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hard-coded PUBLIC in pg_dump (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sunday, December 1, 2002, at 10:49 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: >> PUBLIC doesn't seem like a very common column name --- seems safe to >> make it reserved. We made 'value' reserved in 7.3, and that was a >> much >> more common one. > > I'm still quite unhappy about 'value', and would like to look into > making it unreserved again. This business does show that there are > some > pitfalls in that, though :-( Actually, I don't think it's reserved in 7.3, only in the 7.4 development sources. Otherwise, Bricolage would fail hard, and it doesn't. So there's some time to play with this issue, I think. David -- David Wheeler AIM: dwTheory david@wheeler.net ICQ: 15726394 http://david.wheeler.net/ Yahoo!: dew7e Jabber: Theory@jabber.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: