Re: self join revisited
От | Rikard Pavelic |
---|---|
Тема | Re: self join revisited |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 49D3B56D.9050802@zg.htnet.hr обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: self join revisited (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: self join revisited
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Tom Lane wrote: > Rikard Pavelic <rikard.pavelic@zg.htnet.hr> writes: > >> It would be great if Postgres could rewrite this query >> > > AFAICS those queries are not going to produce the same results, > so Postgres would be 100% incorrect to rewrite it like that for you. > > (If they do produce the same results, it would depend on a bunch > of assumptions you have not stated.) > > regards, tom lane > Can I try again? :) How hard would it be to teach the planner about preserving uniqueness of relations in subqueries? And using that information to remove unnecessary self joins on unique sets? I can try to rewrite some queries to test it on real data for how much gain it would provide. Regards, Rikard
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: