Re: Re: [GENERAL] pgstattuple triggered checkpoint failure and database outage?
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: [GENERAL] pgstattuple triggered checkpoint failure and database outage? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 49D1C444.70707@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] pgstattuple triggered checkpoint failure and database outage? (Stuart Bishop <stuart@stuartbishop.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: [GENERAL] pgstattuple triggered checkpoint failure
and database outage?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Stuart Bishop wrote: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> A quick look at contrib/pgstattuple shows that it makes no effort >> whatsoever to avoid reading temp tables belonging to other sessions. >> So even if that wasn't Stuart's problem (and I'll bet it was), this >> is quite broken. >> >> There is no way that pgstattuple can compute valid stats for temp >> tables of other sessions; it doesn't have access to pages in the other >> sessions' temp buffers. It seems that the alternatives we have are >> to make it throw error, or to silently return zeroes (or perhaps >> nulls?). Neither one is tremendously appetizing. The former would >> be especially unhelpful if someone tried to write a query to apply >> pgstattuple across all pg_class entries, which I kinda suspect is >> what Stuart did. > > This is exactly what happened, and temporary tables belonging to other > sessions where fed to pgstattuple. +1 for throwing an error. That's what we do for views, composite types, and GIN indexes as well. If you want to write a query to call pgstattuple for all tables in pg_class, you'll need to exclude all those cases anyway. To exclude temp tables of other sessions, you'll need to add "AND pg_is_other_temp_schema(relnamespace)". I'm ok with returning NULLs as well, but returning zeroes doesn't feel right. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: