Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params?
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 49B9B96A.40501@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params? (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params?
Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params? Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params? |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Josh, this isn't a rejection. Both Tom and I asked for more exploration > of the implications of doing as you suggest. Tom has been more helpful > than I was in providing some scenarios that would cause problems. It is > up to you to solve the problems, which is often possible. OK, well, barring the context issues, what do people think of the idea? What I was thinking was that this would be a setting on the SET ROLE statement, such as: SET ROLE special WITH SETTINGS ... or similar; I'd need to find an existing keyword which works. I think this bypasses a lot of the issues which Tom raises, but I'd want to think about the various permutations some more. --Josh
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: