Re: Large object restore problem w/triggers
От | Claire McLister |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Large object restore problem w/triggers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 49B93625-1D12-45AC-A0CF-8E37E16EE952@zeesource.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Large object restore problem w/triggers (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Large object restore problem w/triggers
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Thanks for your quick response. Sorry for the omission, the PG version is 7.4.8 How do I temporarily disable the trigger while doing the restore? Should I remove the trigger, do the dump, and then work from there? It's difficult to move to 8.1 right now, so I'd prefer a workaround if we can do that. Claire On Jan 12, 2006, at 10:23 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Claire McLister <mclister@zeesource.net> writes: >> We have a database with a bunch of large objects, who's ids we >> reference in a table. There is a trigger associated with inserts and >> updates on the table to delete the old value when inserting a new >> large object associated with a row in the table. > >> This causes a problem when doing a pg_dump and pg_restore. The dump >> works fine, but when doing a restore it tries to trigger a delete of >> an old large object. It seems that the object id is associated with >> the database that was dumped, and not the one that was restored. So, >> lo_unlink fails and the whole restore aborts. > >> Has anyone seen this behavior before? Am I doing something wrong? >> Is there a workaround for this? > > You haven't said which PG version you're using. > > Pre-8.1, the deal is this: you can never have the same large object > OIDs > in the new database as you did in the old. There is code in > pg_dump/pg_restore to try to update large-object references after the > data load step. A trigger doing what you describe would probably > break > that update step, but you could work around it by disabling the > trigger > temporarily. (I thought that pg_restore was designed to not install > user triggers until after it'd done the OID updating, but maybe this > recollection is wrong.) > > 8.1 has a much nicer approach, which is that there's a variant of > lo_create that allows a large object to be reloaded with the same > OID it > had before. This eliminates the need for the update step in > pg_restore. > If you're having problems in 8.1 then I'd speculate that maybe > there's a > logic bug in your trigger. > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: