Re: I don't want to back up index files
От | Glen Parker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: I don't want to back up index files |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 49B82C3D.60904@nwlink.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: I don't want to back up index files (Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: I don't want to back up index files
Re: I don't want to back up index files |
Список | pgsql-general |
Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz wrote: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: > >>> Any chance of something like this being done in the future? >>> >> I am going to go out on a limb here and say, "no". > > That would probably be possible, by placing all indicies in a separate > directory in data, but.... I could simply use the system catalog to determine which files to backup and which to ignore. I suppose I would prefer to backup all unique indexes, and perhaps all system indexes. It's the proliferation of large indexes that serve only to enhance select performance that I would want to ignore. > So like JD said, if you don't want to dump indicies - just use pg_dump... If pg_dump were an acceptable backup tool, we wouldn't need PITR, would we? We used pg_dump for years. There's a very good reason we no longer do. That suggestion is silly. -Glen
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: