Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 49B575B9.3010804@hagander.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d
Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > Tom Lane wrote: >> "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes: >> >>> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >>>> but maybe it's better to use -i and -I, and thus change them both? >>>> >> >> >>> That's already used: >>> >> >> >>> -i, --ignore-version proceed even when server version mismatches >>> pg_dump version >>> >> >> Proposal: drop the short forms of these two switches entirely. >> Anybody who actually needs the capability can write "--inserts". >> >> >> > > +1. I was just thinking the same thing. +1, that sounds like a very good idea. //Magnus
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: