Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d
От | Selena Deckelmann |
---|---|
Тема | Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 49B56076.6040909@endpoint.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Greg Sabino Mullane<greg@endpoint.com> writes: >> The solution I came up with is to use a new letter, -I, and to deprecate -d by >> having it throw an exception when used. > > "Deprecate" does not mean "break". This '-d' thing is more than just a matter of reading the documentation. Our other command line utilities lead a person to assume (logically) that '-d' means something completely apart from what it actually does. I've made this mistake, so have most other sysadmins I know. While this change may break existing scripts, the result is that future users of Postgres will have a much less painful experience if they accidentally try to use that option. -selena -- Selena Deckelmann End Point Corporation selena@endpoint.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: