Re: Performance of subselects
От | Christian Schröder |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Performance of subselects |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 49B4F352.40001@deriva.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Performance of subselects (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Performance of subselects
Re: Performance of subselects |
Список | pgsql-general |
Scott Marlowe wrote: >> you can run out of memory if too many connections try to use too much >> of it at the same time, that's why it is advisable to set work_mem per >> connection/query, should the connection/query require more. >> > Definitely. > I understand why this is advisable; however, something inside me hates the idea to put this kind of database specific stuff inside an application. How about portability? Why does the application developer have to know about database internals? He knows sql, that should be sufficient. I have the (maybe naive) idea of a clear separation of database administration (including performance tuning) and application development. Is this idea completely wrong? Regards, Christian -- Deriva GmbH Tel.: +49 551 489500-42 Financial IT and Consulting Fax: +49 551 489500-91 Hans-Böckler-Straße 2 http://www.deriva.de D-37079 Göttingen Deriva CA Certificate: http://www.deriva.de/deriva-ca.cer
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: