Re: small parallel restore optimization
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: small parallel restore optimization |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 49B474C8.6090000@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: small parallel restore optimization (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: small parallel restore optimization
Re: small parallel restore optimization |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > >> I have found the source of the problem I saw. dumputils.c:fmtId() uses a >> static PQExpBuffer which it initialises the first time it's called. This >> gets clobbered by simultaneous calls by Windows threads. >> >> I could just make it auto and set it up on each call, but that could >> result in a non-trivial memory leak ... it's probably called a great >> many times. Or I could provide a parallel version where we pass in a >> PQExpBuffer that we create, one per thread, and is used by anything >> called by the parallel code. That seems like a bit of a potential >> footgun, though. >> > > Could you use a different static PQExpBuffer on each thread? > pthread_getspecific sort of thing, only to be used on Windows. > For MSVC we could declare it with "_declspec(thread)" and it would be allocated in thread-local storage, but it looks like this isn't supported on Mingw. > BTW does fmtQualifiedId have the same problem? > > Yes, but it's not called in threaded code - it's only in pg_dump and only pg_restore is threaded. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: