Re: libxml incompatibility
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: libxml incompatibility |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 49B1DFA5.3050905@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: libxml incompatibility ("Holger Hoffstaette" <holger@wizards.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: libxml incompatibility
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Holger Hoffstaette wrote: > On Fri, 06 Mar 2009 14:32:25 -0600, Kenneth Marshall wrote: > > >> On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 02:58:30PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> >>> Yes, I discovered this a few weeks ago. It looks like libxml is not >>> reentrant, so for perl you need to use some other XML library. Very >>> annoying. >>> >>> >> Ugh! That is worse than a simple library link incompatibility. >> > > http://www.nabble.com/New-libxml-which-is-reentrant---to18329452.html > > Seems to me that Perl (?) is calling functions it is not supposed to call > - I'm guessing due to assumptions about mismatching lifecycles. The > parsing functions themselves are supposedly reentrant. > > > Maybe someone can trace the libxml calls ... not sure how exactly ... given Alvaro's example, it doesn't seem likely to me that this is due to a call to xmlCleanupParser(), but maybe the perl code invokes by simply doing "use XML::LibXML;" calls that for some perverse reason. My interest wasn't so high that I wanted to spend a lot of time on it. If it didn't work I was just going to move on. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: