Re: Make SIGHUP less painful if pg_hba.conf is not readable
От | Selena Deckelmann |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Make SIGHUP less painful if pg_hba.conf is not readable |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 49ADFB5D.8040304@endpoint.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Make SIGHUP less painful if pg_hba.conf is not readable (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Make SIGHUP less painful if pg_hba.conf is not readable
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Selena Deckelmann <selena@endpoint.com> writes: >> From the comment in hba.c, it appears that the desired behavior is to >> have the system ignore the failure, > > I'm not sure how you could possibly read that comment that way. Right. Sorry, poor choice of words. I meant "don't die on reload", essentially. > It might be sane to distinguish initial load from reload, but I think > the behavior is correct as-is for initial load. Agreed. > Also, if we are going to do something like this, we should make sure > it's consistent across all the config files. Ok. I can do that. I'll check with some other people before I send another patch, and I'll go through the rest of the config file loads tomorrow. -selena -- Selena Deckelmann End Point Corporation selena@endpoint.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: