Re: 50 line queries (new flyer)
От | Peter Headland |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 50 line queries (new flyer) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 49ADBE28.7000203@matrixlink.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 50 line queries (new flyer) (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Josh Berkus wrote: > Peter Headland wrote: >> Excuse my ignorance - I didn't understand the reference to 50-line >> queries in the original version of the new flyer. I assume that >> no-one thinks 50 lines of text is indicative of an especially complex >> query, so what did that mean? > > Just *try* to run a 50-line query (with multiple subselects, etc.) on > MySQL or SQLite. Ah. I'm used to seeing queries with several hundred (long, dense, and unreadable) lines that run just fine on Oracle, so the "50 lines" thing made me wonder "if they think that's complex, maybe they can't handle the really heavy stuff" - IOW, the opposite of what was intended. Fortunately, that part is not in the final version of the document, so it's moot. I guess it's tricky to write a single document that hits all the right notes with both the Oracle and MySQL crowds... -- Peter Headland
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: