Re: real multi-master replication?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Steve Atkins
Тема Re: real multi-master replication?
Дата
Msg-id 49AD346D-D671-4BB0-B9D5-BFAFCB9113CE@blighty.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на real multi-master replication?  ("hubert depesz lubaczewski" <depesz@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: real multi-master replication?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: real multi-master replication?  ("hubert depesz lubaczewski" <depesz@gmail.com>)
Re: real multi-master replication?  (Omar Eljumaily <omar2@omnicode.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On Mar 4, 2007, at 11:18 AM, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:

> hi,
> i read about some replication system for postgresql, but - as far as i
> know there is none real multi-master replication system for
> postgresql.
> all i have seen are based on "query replication" with various "hacks"
> for specific constructions (like now()).
> my question is - is there any (even fully commercial) multi-master
> replication system for postgresql that will work with all possible
> constructs, triggers, random data and so on?
> i mean - i dont want to bother with choosing to 'note' somehow that
> 'this particular query' has to be replicated somehow.
> i'm thinking about working solution that will allow multi-master
> connections.

I don't believe there is, or can be, any asynchronous multi-master
replication system for any database that will work with all possible
general purpose constructs.

Given that, you might need to be more specific about your
needs (and rethink your application architecture based on the
reality of the issue), unless the constraints of synchronous
replication work for you particular problem space.

Cheers,
   Steve


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Mageshwaran
Дата:
Сообщение: Postgres Replication
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: real multi-master replication?