Re: real multi-master replication?
От | Steve Atkins |
---|---|
Тема | Re: real multi-master replication? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 49AD346D-D671-4BB0-B9D5-BFAFCB9113CE@blighty.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | real multi-master replication? ("hubert depesz lubaczewski" <depesz@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: real multi-master replication?
Re: real multi-master replication? Re: real multi-master replication? |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mar 4, 2007, at 11:18 AM, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote: > hi, > i read about some replication system for postgresql, but - as far as i > know there is none real multi-master replication system for > postgresql. > all i have seen are based on "query replication" with various "hacks" > for specific constructions (like now()). > my question is - is there any (even fully commercial) multi-master > replication system for postgresql that will work with all possible > constructs, triggers, random data and so on? > i mean - i dont want to bother with choosing to 'note' somehow that > 'this particular query' has to be replicated somehow. > i'm thinking about working solution that will allow multi-master > connections. I don't believe there is, or can be, any asynchronous multi-master replication system for any database that will work with all possible general purpose constructs. Given that, you might need to be more specific about your needs (and rethink your application architecture based on the reality of the issue), unless the constraints of synchronous replication work for you particular problem space. Cheers, Steve
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: