Re: Immediate shutdown and system(3)
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Immediate shutdown and system(3) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 49AB91F0.2010304@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Immediate shutdown and system(3) (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Immediate shutdown and system(3)
Re: Immediate shutdown and system(3) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Fujii Masao wrote: > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Heikki Linnakangas > <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> I'm leaning towards option 3, but I wonder if anyone sees a better solution. > > 4. Use the shared memory to tell the startup process about the shutdown state. > When a shutdown signal arrives, postmaster sets the corresponding shutdown > state to the shared memory before signaling to the child processes. The startup > process check the shutdown state whenever executing system(), and determine > how to exit according to that state. This solution doesn't change any existing > behavior of pg_standby. What is your opinion? That would only solve the problem for pg_standby. Other programs you might use as a restore_command or archive_command like "cp" or "rsync" would still core dump on the SIGQUIT. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: