Re: Hot standby, recovery infra
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hot standby, recovery infra |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 49A6F489.109@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hot standby, recovery infra (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote: > On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 20:38 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > >> I think we should simply remove the signal handler for SIGQUIT from >> pg_standby. > > If you do this, please make it release dependent so pg_standby behaves > correctly for the release it is being used with. Hmm, I don't think there's a way for pg_standby to know which version of PostgreSQL is calling it. Assuming there is, how would you want it to behave? If you want no change in behavior in old releases, can't we just leave it unfixed in back-branches? In fact, it seems more useful to not detect the server version, so that if you do want the new behavior, you can use a 8.4 pg_standby against a 8.3 server. In back-branches, I think we need to decide between fixing this, at the risk of breaking someone's script that is using "killall -QUIT pg_standby" or similar to trigger failover, and leaving it as it is knowing that immediate shutdown doesn't work on a standby server. I'm not sure which is best. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: