Re: [HACKERS] Regression tests vs existing users in an installation
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Regression tests vs existing users in an installation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 499f2909-d6e4-4f50-d88a-0e3dc9530f4e@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Regression tests vs existing users in an installation (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Regression tests vs existing users in an installation
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-06-29 19:21, Tom Lane wrote: > Stephen Frost<sfrost@snowman.net> writes: >> * Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: >>> We could make the new subdirectory be something specific like >>> "src/test/modules/test_rolenames", but I think very likely we'll be >>> wanting some additional test scripts that we likewise deem unsafe to >>> run during "installcheck". So I'd rather choose a more generic module >>> name, but I'm not sure what ... "unsafe_tests"? >> Agreed but haven't got any particularly good suggestions on names.. > Hearing no better suggestions, I went with "unsafe_tests" in the > attached. I found this directory, and it seems like a good place to add some more tests (other thread), but I'm puzzled why it's hidden under modules/, since it's not, well, a module. Why is it not in src/test/? -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: