Jacky Leng wrote:
>> Asserts on data-consistency checks aren't really a good idea.
>>
>> (IOW this is "can't happen" only as long as your database isn't
>> corrupt...)
>>
>
> Then why not change this to an "ereport(PANIC ...)"?
If you have a corrupted database, you want to be able to read it, not
panic. If anything, we could put a WARNING there, but I'm not 100% sure
it really is a "can't happen" case.
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com