Re: Hot standby, recovery infra

Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 14:26 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> 
>> The outer "if" should ensure that it isn't printed repeatedly on an idle 
>> system. 
> 
> Regrettably not.

Ok, committed. I fixed that and some comment changes. I also renamed 
IsRecoveryProcessingMode() to RecoveryInProgress(), to avoid confusion 
with the "real" processing modes defined in miscadmin.h. That will 
probably cause you merge conflicts in the hot standby patch, but it 
should be a matter of search-replace to fix.

The changes need to be documented. At least the removal of 
log_restartpoints is a clear user-visible change.

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com