Re: differnce from ansi sql standard - unicode strings?
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: differnce from ansi sql standard - unicode strings? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 499AD340.4050502@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | differnce from ansi sql standard - unicode strings? (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: differnce from ansi sql standard - unicode strings?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel Stehule wrote: > I found BNF for SQL 2003 and I found there some small difference. > Standard use keyword ESCAPE, but PostgreSQL use keybord UESCAPE. > > Anybody knows reason? > > <Unicode character string literal> ::= > [ <introducer> <character set specification> ] > U <ampersand> <quote> [ <Unicode representation> ... ] <quote> > [ { <separator> <quote> [ <Unicode representation> ... ] <quote> }... ] > [ ESCAPE <escape character> ] My copy has <Unicode character string literal> ::= [ <introducer><character set specification> ] U<ampersand><quote> [ <Unicode representation>... ] <quote> [ { <separator> <quote> [ <Unicode representation>... ] <quote> }... ] <Unicode escape specifier> <Unicode escape specifier> ::= [ UESCAPE <quote><Unicode escape character><quote> ]
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: