Re: White paper on very big databases
От | Hans-Juergen Schoenig |
---|---|
Тема | Re: White paper on very big databases |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 49907D5F.8090401@cybertec.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: White paper on very big databases ("Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Jonah H. Harris wrote: > On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com > <mailto:jd@commandprompt.com>> wrote: > > Well therein lies the problem. CMD has a customer with a > multi-terrabyte > table (not including the rest of the database) but we can't really > talk > about it :( > > > IIRC, EnterpriseDB had one customer with over 1TB of data, but they > too would have been hush-hush about it. When I was consulting, I saw > very few Postgres databases at or over 1TB. While Postgres can handle > fairly large data sets, it lacks some fairly important VLDB features > which is probably why there are so few people with multi-terabyte PG > databases. Perhaps JD/Fetter know of more, but I can count the ones I > know of at < 10. > > -- > Jonah H. Harris, Senior DBA > myYearbook.com > hello everybody, i know GIS databases which are ways bigger than 1 TB. the biggest one i have seen personally recently was around 8 TB. i had my hands on a 12 TB biest 3 years ago. for the database size is not the real problem; the problem is rather getting stuff in. for most people the question is: is there anything we could still store which would finally end up being 12 TB or more :). 80% of all people will never get there even if they store every little movement everywhere :). hans -- Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH Professional PostgreSQL Consulting, Support, Training Gröhrmühlgasse 26, A-2700 Wiener Neustadt Web: www.postgresql-support.de
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: