Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4990.1128700610@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not? ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not?
Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not? Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not? Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> writes: >> Also they >> don't need to modify >> scripts, can't they just write thier own pg_cacnel_backend to >> return int >> based on the boolean version? > No, because you can't overload based purely on return type. I suppose > they could write it to take an int8 pid or something, but that's a hack. Well, how many people want to vote for Andreas' suggestion of having both int pg_cancel_backend(int)bool pg_backend_cancel(int) with the former deprecated but still there for backward compatibility? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: