Re: suggestions for postgresql setup on Dell 2950 , PERC6i controller
От | justin |
---|---|
Тема | Re: suggestions for postgresql setup on Dell 2950 , PERC6i controller |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 498C5FD6.1060608@emproshunts.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: suggestions for postgresql setup on Dell 2950 , PERC6i controller (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Bruce Momjian wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:200902061527.n16FREp25859@momjian.us" type="cite"><pre wrap="">Matt Burke wrote:</pre><blockquote type="cite"><pre wrap=""> we'd have no choice other than replacing the server+shelf+disks. I want to see just how much better a high-end Areca/Adaptec controller is, but I just don't think I can get approval for a ?1000 card "because some guy on the internet said the PERC sucks". Would that same person say it sucked if it came in Areca packaging? Am I listening to the advice of a professional, or a fanboy? </pre></blockquote><pre wrap=""> The experiences I have heard is that Dell looks at server hardware in the same way they look at their consumer gear, "If I put in a cheaper part, how much will it cost Dell to warranty replace it". Sorry, but I don't look at my performance or downtime in the same way Dell does. ;-) </pre></blockquote> It always boils down to money. To communicate to the ones controlling the purse strings talk dollar bills. To get what one wants from the pursestring holders give examples like this. <br /> Buying cheap hardware can result in a complete shut down resulting inlost sales and/or non productive labor being spent. <br /><br /> Example would be a company generates 100 sales ordersan hour average $100 = $10,000 if the server is down for 8 hours 1 business day thats $80,000 lost in business. nowlets throw in labor average hourly rate lets say $15.00 an hour for 10 people = $150.00 for 8 hours = $1200 in lost labor. Now throw in overtime to get caught up $1800 total labor cost = $3000<br /><br /> The $200 to $300 saved on thecard was a good decision :-(<br /><br /> Now the argument can be made hardware failures are low so that goes out thedoor<br /><br /> Your next best argument is showing the waste in lost productivity. Lets say because of the cheap hardwarepurchased the users must sit idle 3 seconds per transactions times 100 transactions per day = 300 seconds lostX 10 people = 3000 Seconds per day X 235 working days = 705000/60/60 = 196 hours lost per year times 3years for averagelife span of the server = 588 hours X average pay rate $15 = $8820.00 lost labor<br /><br /> Again smart thinking. <br /><br /> There are all kind of ways to win these arguments to push for higher quality hardware.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: