Re: Pet Peeves?
От | Guy Rouillier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Pet Peeves? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4989D25B.7020303@burntmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Pet Peeves? ("Karsten Hilbert" <Karsten.Hilbert@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Pet Peeves?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Karsten Hilbert wrote: >>> Craig, what kind of "events" are you thinking about? Triggers are >>> already pieces of code that run upon "certain events", namely insert, >>> update or delete events. What others do you have in mind? >> That's a good point, actually. I can't think of much you can't do with a >> trigger (SECURITY DEFINER if necessary) on a table. Not thinking straight. > > I would find ON CONNECT/DISCONNECT triggers very useful. Probably > this is more similar to database-wide assertions. But a job scheduler would not help with that. Perhaps you intended your comment to fall into the "pet peeves" bucket rather than the "job scheduler" bucket. -- Guy Rouillier
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: