Guy Rouillier wrote:
> And someone else might want to play that game inside PG ;).
In fact, given how extensible PG is in other ways, it's surprising there
hasn't been more call for it. Perhaps the fact there there's presently
no facility for stored procedures to easily manage transactions has
something to do with it?
An internal job scheduler with the ability to fire jobs on certain
events as well as on a fixed schedule could be particularly handy in
conjunction with true stored procedures that could explicitly manage
transactions.
--
Craig Ringer