Re: LATIN2->UTF8 conversation with dblink
От | Joe Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: LATIN2->UTF8 conversation with dblink |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4987AC82.8030608@joeconway.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: LATIN2->UTF8 conversation with dblink (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] LATIN2->UTF8 conversation with dblink
|
Список | pgsql-novice |
Tom Lane wrote: > Ruzsinszky Attila <ruzsinszky.attila@gmail.com> writes: >> The DB is the same except the character coding. Source is LATIN2 and >> the target DB is UTF8. >> We wrote a trigger to copy the data from source to target with dblink. >> The problem is the >> different DB character coding! PGSQL complains about wrong byte order. > > Hmm. You can presumably fix this by setting client_encoding in the > dblink connection to match the encoding in use in the database it's > called in. But I wonder why dblink doesn't just do that for you > automatically. Mainly because I never thought about it myself before, and this is the first time I've seen someone complain ;-) But if you think automatically setting client encoding is appropriate, I will make the change. Would it be classified as a bug (and therefore something to backpatch) or a new feature? Joe
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: