Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> Josh Berkus wrote:
>>>>> Yea, it would take some work but it is an idea.
>>>> It's *an* idea,yes.  But it introduces as many (or more) problems than 
>>>> it solves.
>>> Ah, but my problems might be easier solved than the row-level permission
>>> problems.  ;-)
>>>
>> Or might not.  Multi-partition indexes?  Multi-partition uniqueness? 
>> Automated moving of rows between partitions?
> 
> Are you trying to make some kind of point?
> 

IMVHO Josh was describing a nice-to-have TODO list for a partitions feature
in general. :-)  Maybe he was saying that when they partitioning feature
is designed that they try to think of polyinstantiation as they design it :-)