Re: Pet Peeves?
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Pet Peeves? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 49830015.8070604@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Pet Peeves? (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Pet Peeves?
Re: Pet Peeves? Re: Pet Peeves? |
Список | pgsql-general |
Gregory Stark wrote: > So, what do people say? Is Postgres perfect in your world or does it do some > things which rub you the wrong way? * No offer of anything-but-CVS on pgfoundry.org * Lack of REINDEX CONCURRENTLY * Too many obscure configuration options: memory management, autovacuum management, freespace map, background writer, WAL. * Writing robust scripts with psql is difficult and bizarre. * Default postgresql.conf is too long and verbose. * Default logging configuration is too minimal. * Difficult to trace nested things, e.g., nested PL/pgSQL calls, cascaded foreign key actions. * No basic health checking: Answering the question, "Is this system configured reasonably and running smoothly" takes two days of training and half a day of work. * Too much accumulated historical garbage that is never cleared out.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: