Re: Git conversion progress report and call for testing assistance
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Git conversion progress report and call for testing assistance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4982.1282939372@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Git conversion progress report and call for testing assistance (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Git conversion progress report and call for testing assistance
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 21:30, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> OK, the list works now, but the commitdiff links in the messages do >> not. �Looks like they are pointing at the wrong repository. > Well, actually, they point to the right one, but the mirroring off to > that one is turned off. There are just too many different versions > right now to keep that thing pointing the right way :-) Oh, OK. In any case, you asked for feedback on the message format, so here is some: I don't like having the commitdiff link first. I think the log message is the most important thing and should be first. Possible format (based on the example I just received): Log Message ----------- Another experimental commit. Undo hacking other people previously did on README. Branch ------ REL9_0_STABLE Details ------- http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql-migration.git;a=commitdiff;h=1add27be08978f20edb67ca5854f6701f0f6ea86 Summary ------- README | 4 ---- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) You could argue it either way about whether to put the commitdiff link before or after the change summary, but offhand I think before will be more useful. If there are a lot of files touched, people won't want to have to scroll to the bottom to find the link. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: