Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable
От | Ron Mayer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4980DB50.8050105@cheapcomplexdevices.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost wrote: > And, just to go full circle, row-level access controls are exactly what > the other enterprise RDBMSs have and is what is used in these security > circles today. One of the major issues, as I understand it, is to be > able to use stock applications with multiple security levels where the > application doesn't know (or care about) the security level. Doing that > through views and partitions and triggers and whatnot for each and every > application that is run on these systems will be a big hurdle to those > users, if it ends up being workable at all. That seems to me to be a shortcoming of the partition system and a good TODO for the future partitioning improvements. Why shouldn't be just as easy to make sure a row ends up in the right partition as opposed to making sure it's tagged with right row-level ACLs.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: