Re: pg_upgrade project status
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_upgrade project status |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 49800816.9050504@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_upgrade project status (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_upgrade project status
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> That implies a fairly robust and configurable system for adding to and >> rewriting system catalogs, which today we haven't got. > > And we won't ever have, because it's unnecessary and would be impossibly > complex. We know how to do the catalog update: basically, dump, initdb, > reload, then move the data in. There are some corner case issues like > how to preserve toast table OIDs, but the idea that we are going to > invent a special process for each catalog change is just not reasonable. Right, the dump+initdb+reload approach works quite well in both pg_upgrade and pg-migrator. I believe the biggest issue with that ATM is supporting dropped columns, and maybe there's something else, but it's fairly robust and works across any versions. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: