Re: Hot standby, recovery infrastructure
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hot standby, recovery infrastructure |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 497F4E68.5070308@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hot standby, recovery infrastructure (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Hot standby, recovery infrastructure
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote: > On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 17:50 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > >> Hmm, I think we have small issue if the last WAL segment restored from >> the archive is an incomplete one: > > All normal archive recoveries have "complete" WAL files, since an xlog > switch record jumps past missing entries at the end of the file. So I > was just about to say "how can it be an incomplete one?", to which the > answer is file damage of some kind causing a failed CRC check. > > So yes, it is possible and no, the patch doesn't work that way yet. Actually, the code already deals with that possibility. That's the motivation for the timelines: the new WAL record will be generated with a new timelineid. We never append to an existing WAL file after archive recovery. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: