Re: Hot standby, RestoreBkpBlocks and cleanup locks
| От | Heikki Linnakangas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Hot standby, RestoreBkpBlocks and cleanup locks |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 49762C5A.5080600@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Hot standby, RestoreBkpBlocks and cleanup locks (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote: > I did want you to commit those changes, but that was 8 days ago and much > has changed since then. Now, I'm slightly worried that this may be a > retrograde step. The last 3 days I've been refactoring the code to > account for other requirements, as I have been discussing, and some of > these things have now changed. Though the general pattern of your > suggested refactoring remains the same. I figured there's possibly some further changes, but the general idea to move the responsibility of restoring backup blocks to the redo function should remain the same. > Can we plan a move to GIT? We can both work on things at the same time > and my changes can be more visible. There will be some initial pain... Sure, just go ahead and publish a repository. Or would you like me to apply the patches and publish a repository you can clone from? Perhaps that would be easier since I'm already familiar with GIT. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: