Re: libpq WSACleanup is not needed
От | Andrew Chernow |
---|---|
Тема | Re: libpq WSACleanup is not needed |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4975FF0E.9050407@esilo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: libpq WSACleanup is not needed (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: libpq WSACleanup is not needed
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Andrew Chernow wrote: >> Bruce Momjian wrote: >>> Ah, OK, so it does its own cleanup on last close, great. I agree a >>> connection option for this would be good. >>> >> What would the option be? "wsainit = [enable | disable]"? Maybe it >> should allow setting the version to load: "wsa_version = 2.0". Maybe >> the two should be combined: "wsa_version = [default | disable | 2.0]". > > I assumed it would be like SSL, which is a libpq function call, not a > connection option, e.g. PQinitSSL(), and I think true/false is probably > enough. PQinitSSL info: > > If you are using <acronym>SSL</> inside your application (in addition > to inside <application>libpq</application>), you can use > <function>PQinitSSL(int)</> to tell <application>libpq</application> > that the <acronym>SSL</> library has already been initialized by your > application. > That smells dirty to me. How many PQinitXXX() functions are needed before we drop the XXX and run with PQinit(...)? -- Andrew Chernow eSilo, LLC every bit counts http://www.esilo.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: