Re: libpq WSACleanup is not needed

Andrew Chernow wrote:
> Andrew Chernow wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>>
>>> Ah, OK, so it does its own cleanup on last close, great. I agree a
>>> connection option for this would be good.
>>>
>>
>> What would the option be?  "wsainit = [enable | disable]"?  Maybe it 
>> should allow setting the version to load: "wsa_version = 2.0".  Maybe 
>> the two should be combined: "wsa_version = [default | disable | 2.0]".
>>
>
> I will say, the cleanest solution is still an optional init()/uninit() 
> for libpq.  Has this been ruled out?  IMHO, the next best solution is 
> a connection option.

What happened to the idea of counting connections? That seemed a 
relatively clean way to go, I thought, although I haven't followed the 
discussion very closely.

cheers

andrew