Re: libpq WSACleanup is not needed

Magnus Hagander wrote:
> The use-case of rapidly creating and dropping connections isn't
> particularly common, I think. And there is a perfectly functioning
> workaround - something that we should perhaps document in the FAQ or
> somewhere in the documentation?
>   
Would it be accetable to do initialise if the number of connections is 
changing from 0, and
tidy if the cumber goes back to 0?  Applications that retain a 
connection would not
suffer the cost on subsequent connect/disconnect.

The init/term is the tidiest way to do it, but the above might help - 
perhaps init could just
add a phantom usecount and work the same way.

If you have a DLL for libpq, could you do it in process attach and 
detach?  Wouldn't
that be the most common case anyway?

James