Re: SET TRANSACTION and SQL Standard
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SET TRANSACTION and SQL Standard |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 49675BD0.502@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | SET TRANSACTION and SQL Standard (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: SET TRANSACTION and SQL Standard
Re: SET TRANSACTION and SQL Standard |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote: > I notice that we allow commands such as > > SET TRANSACTION read only read write read only; > > BEGIN TRANSACTION read only read only read only; > > Unsurprisingly, these violate the SQL Standard: > * p.977 section 19.1 syntax (1) > * p.957 section 17.3 syntax (2) Well, we allow a lot of things. Violations of the SQL standard happen when a command that appears in the standard doesn't do what the standard says. Allowing commands that are not in the standard is not a violation. While there is no huge use case for these particular cases, tolerating redundant options is sometimes useful.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: