Re: generic reloptions improvement

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> KaiGai Kohei wrote:
>> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> 
>>> So this is an updated patch.  This now allows a user-defined AM to
>>> create new reloptions and pass them down to the parser for parsing and
>>> checking.
>> This patch does not support reloptions in string expression, like:
> 
> No, it doesn't.  I asked about it some time ago and nobody answered.  If
> people feel it is important, I can implement it.

Oh, I missed to see the message.

If it is provided for v8.4, I'm happy at least.
The Row-level ACLs need its reloption to specify default ACLs in string
expression. Currently, it modifies "reloptions.c", but using it on common
framework will be more appropriate implementation.

Thanks,
-- 
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>