Re: About CMake
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: About CMake |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4959563F.4080709@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: About CMake (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: About CMake
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Gregory Stark wrote: > > We could use autoconf on win32 using cygwin utilities for things like sh and > awk. Just because we use those tools doesn't mean we have to use a cygwin > compiler or linker to actually do the build. > Making Cygwin a build time requirement for using MSVC is something we seriously wish to avoid. > And we could always ship the preconfigured pg_config.h from a normal Windows > machine with cygwin installed since they're all the same (in theory). > > I think it has more to do with the build-time tools. We have Makefile rules > that use awk or sed in them and those wouldn't work unless you have cygwin > installed when building. And in any case we want to use MSVC project files and > MSVC's make-equivalent to actually drive the build which kind of rules out > using the Makefile rules as-is. > > Quite so. CMake outputs MSVC Project files, as I understand it. If you know of another cross-platform build tool that will do that then speak up. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: