Re: How are locks managed in PG?
От | Geoffrey |
---|---|
Тема | Re: How are locks managed in PG? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 494F8A0E.8070900@serioustechnology.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: How are locks managed in PG? ("Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: How are locks managed in PG?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Jonah H. Harris wrote: > On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 11:02 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com> wrote: >> The difference is HE put forth an opinion about the pg developers >> being smarter, but you put forth what seems like a statement of fact >> with no evidence to back it up. One is quite subjective and open for >> debate on both sides, and often to good effect. The other is a >> statement of fact regarding scalability in apparently all usage >> circumstances, since it wasn't in any way clarified if you were >> talking about a narrow usage case or all of the possible and / or >> probably ones. > > Agreed. It's just that, because I know quite a few of the engineers > working on Oracle and SQL Server, it generally pisses me off to see > people make blanket statements about one group being smarter than > another when they probably have no basis for comparison. It's all > good though, I'm just cranky tonight. I still haven't seen a post regarding the Oracle scalability issue. Where is the data?? -- Until later, Geoffrey Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. - Benjamin Franklin
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: