- Архив списков рассылки pgsql-performance
От | |
---|---|
Тема | |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 49486.216.80.95.13.1038853850.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re:
Re: |
Список | pgsql-performance |
[I hope job postings are kosher...] I need help optimizing a PostgreSQL application: Full-text search ~17,000 records Articles (text) are about 10K long on average, ranging from 0 to 278K. I don't know if we need to throw more RAM, more hard drive, more comparison RAM in postmaster.conf or build a concordance or if this is just not something that can be done within our budget. I can't even seem to get the PostgreSQL profiling output using "-s" in the startup of postmaster and client to determine what the db engine is doing. I don't understand why PostgreSQL sometimes chooses not to use the existing INDEXes to do an index scan instead of sequential scan -- Does it really think sequential will be faster, or does it eliminate an index scan because there won't be enough hard drive or swap space to do it? Currently, full text search queries take on the order of 2 minutes to execute. We need them to be happening in 5 seconds, if at all possible. Unfortunately, this needs to happen EARLY THIS WEEK, if at all possible. Contact me off-list with some idea of price/availability/references if you are interested in taking on this task. THANKS!
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: