Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 49455F97.6050105@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle ("Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle
Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Jonah, > Hmm... I wonder how scientific his benchmarking is and how well his > Oracle system was tuned. Because I've done quite a few performance > comparisons between Postgres 8.3 and 8.4-dev against a well-tuned > Oracle8i instance on Linux, and 8i (from 1999) beats the latest > versions of Postgres quite handily on the same hardware. What tests are you running? There are certainly things, performance-wise, which Oracle does better than us. There are also things they do worse. I'll point out that, the last time we had public comparables head-to-head, with *Oracle* doing Oracle's tuning on SpecJAppserver, PostgreSQL was around 90% of Oracle *10* on analogous hardware. In internal tests at Sun I can't quote directly, that comparison held on succeeding generations of hardware I wasn't allowed to publish :-( And I'd match the Sun performance labs' knowledge of Oracle tuning against yours any day. Not, on TPC-E on the other hand, Oracle is way ahead of us ... we were like 50% last I checked, due mostly to the amount of time it takes us to resolve lock conflicts vs. Oracle. Of course, Microsoft is beating Oracle by 50%, so Oracle is not the one to match on that benchmark. --Josh
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: