Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays
От | Andreas Karlsson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4943700c-fe86-1044-ee0d-069c8a134f6c@proxel.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays (Mark Rofail <markm.rofail@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/13/2017 12:32 PM, Mark Rofail wrote: > == The @>> operator > I would argue that allocating an array of datums and building an > array would have the same complexity > > > I am not sure what you mean here. Just because something has the > same complexity does not mean there can't be major performance > differences. > > I have spend a lot of time working on this operator and would like to > benefit from it. How should I go about this ? Start a new patch ? I am still not sure what you mean here. Feel free to add @>> to this patch if you like. You may want to submit it as two patch files (but please keep them as the same commitfest entry) but I leave that decision all up to you. > So the two main issues we remain to resolve are MATCH FULL and the > RI_Initial_Check() query refactoring. The problem is that I am not one > of the original authors and have not touched this part of the code. > I understand the problem but it will take some time for me to understand > how to resolve everything. Cool, feel free to ask if you need some assistance. I want this patch. Andreas
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: