Re: Bootstrap DATA is a pita
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bootstrap DATA is a pita |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 494.1424537012@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bootstrap DATA is a pita (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bootstrap DATA is a pita
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > On 02/21/2015 09:39 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> Personally, I think I would prefer that we use JSON (and yes, there's >> a JSON::Tiny module, which definitely lives up to its name). >> For one thing, we've made a feature of supporting JSON, so arguably we >> should eat the same dog food. We've also made a feature of supporting XML, and a lot earlier, so that argument seems pretty weak. My only real requirement on the format choice is that it should absolutely not require any Perl module that's not in a bog-standard installation. I've gotten the buildfarm code running on several ancient machines now and in most cases getting the module dependencies dealt with was pure hell. No non-core modules for a basic build please. I don't care whether they are "tiny". regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: