Re: parallel restore vs. windows
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: parallel restore vs. windows |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 493F0E21.9050508@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: parallel restore vs. windows (Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Philip Warner wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > >> I think pretty much everybody except Philip Warner has found the stuff >> around the TOC data structure and the "archiver" API to be confusing. >> I'm not immediately sure about a better design though, at least not if >> you don't want to duplicate a lot of code between the plain pg_dump and >> the pg_dump/pg_restore cases. >> >> > > Here was I thinking it was more or less self-documenting and clear ;-). > But, yes, it is complex, and I can still see no way to reduce the > complexity. I should have some old notes on the code and am happy to > expand them as much as necessary. > > If people want to nominate key areas of confusion, I will concentrate on > those first. > > In terms of the current discussion, I am not sure I can help greatly; > writing cross-platform thread code is non-trivial. One minor point: I > noticed in early versions of the code that a global AH had been created > -- it occurs to me that this could be problem. > > No, it's not. It's not used in any thread except the main thread. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: